 Quote: |
|
Originally Posted by zinger002 you cant really compair a kicker solox to any mtx sub lol... ok then... i pretty sure that the solo x has about .3 inches of x max... where the mtx superwoofers have coser to 1 inch of x max...
cone area plus xmax is displacement... kicker makes square subs... more cone but not necessarily better... i pretty sure if mtx created a square sub it would be pretty dam close to a kicker sub...
but what is the solo x... the kicker sub god... it is the best sub they make...
now on the other hand what is the best sub mtx makes... the jack fuggin hammer... im prettu sure who would win that spl battle. |
actually ya..the kicker solo x 18 is a far better sub than that jackhammer junk.
Cone area and x max = displacement ...correct. But not neccessarily a louder SPL score.
The solo X is a far better SPL sub than mtx 9500s and would embarrass a jackhammer.
Theres a guy in the US using a single jackhammer in a wall for bassrace and is doing around 147. Congratulations, you just wasted how many thousands of dollars?
Jackhammer=junk
Solo X=SPL monster sub. Some have gotten louder with solo X's than DD 9900s
