 | |  | |  | | 3 way up front, positioning | | CCA Back Bacon
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: London, Ontario Posts: 10
| Hey all,
So I have have a 3 way component system I am going to put in my car. I was wondering for SQ, which setup is better;
Midbass in the door, midrange and tweeter a kick panel
or
midbass in a kick, midrange and tweeter in the door |
| | |   |  | |  | | Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: BC Posts: 13,715
| My vote goes to #1
__________________ Paul Niwranski
1966 Cadillac Superior Crown Royale Limousine Hearse 
If you're mirrors ain't shakin...you got taken...
RIP Member #8
Be careful what you wish for... |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Hoser
Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 387
| I must admit, I've never tried the latter. But I've gotten great results with mids and tweets in the kicks, midbass in the doors.
I take this approach on all my cars for 2 reasons:
1) I believe equal PLD (path length differences) are more important in 200Hz-20Khz range rather than the midbass freqs.
2) It's much easier to get good midbass in well sealed doors rather than kicks which are almost always too small.
Hope that helps.
G. |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Golden Toque
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: ontario, woodbridge Posts: 1,959
| I guess you could always try it out first by building some boxes before you commit.
__________________ 2004 300M SPECIAL
Alpine CDA 9833
Alpine Pxa-h701
Alpine Rux-c701
Rockford fosgate p400-4
Rockford fosgate p4004
Hifonics BX 1205D
JBL c608 GTi
JBL p693
Infinity 2.5" center channel
Alpine type R 12"(2)
all active SQL set up with 1900 watts rms |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Golden Toque
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: bc delta Posts: 4,334
| Quote: | |
Originally Posted by bhouseski Hey all,
So I have have a 3 way component system I am going to put in my car. I was wondering for SQ, which setup is better;
Midbass in the door, midrange and tweeter a kick panel
or
midbass in a kick, midrange and tweeter in the door | why not tweeters in the a pillers ?
move them higher then the door
__________________ EVERY FAMILY HAS A RETARD IN IT. IF YOU THINK THAT YOURS DOESNT HAVE ONE, THEN ITS PROBABLY YOU. |
| | |   |    | |  | | CCA Hoser
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Quebec Posts: 69
| Quote: | |
Originally Posted by bhouseski Hey all,
So I have have a 3 way component system I am going to put in my car. I was wondering for SQ, which setup is better;
Midbass in the door, midrange and tweeter a kick panel
or
midbass in a kick, midrange and tweeter in the door | mid bass in the door (more omni directionnal)
midrange and main tweeter in kickpod ( oriented opposite side)
image tweeter in the a pillar
if you have only one pair of tweeter try both a-pillar and kickpod to see if in the kickpod you image is enough high..
__________________ Car Sound system:
HU: **New** Ural CDD
Speaker: CDT ES-620, crossover: ES-200US, Tweeter: DRT-26 (silk) et TW-24 (silk soft)
Subwoofers: 2 x CDT ES-SQ-1200
Ampli sub: Elemental Design NIne.1 (1200W rms @ 1 ohm)
Ampli Speaker: Elemental Design NIne.2x ( 200 W rms @ 4 ohm )
RCA: Monster Cable 402XLN
Insonorisation: Portes avants et coffre arrière au B-Quiet Extreme
Power: Batterie Otpima Yellow top D35
Wiring: 0 Ga wire
Everything being installed with love an passion and a old lovely Toyota Cressida 89... |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Back Bacon
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Brazil Posts: 1
| midrange and main tweeter in A pillar. |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA McKenzie
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Kitchener, ON Posts: 627
| My vote goes to #1 and it's approximately what I'd do, but only tweeter in the a-pil.
I'm also concerned with with functionality and no bling bling steal me screaming look. Otherwise I'd put a midrange in a-pil. |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Back Bacon
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Saskatoon Posts: 10
| Last time I checked my ears weren't on my feet.
The higher frequencies are definately "line of sight" so, the higher, or more accurately... the more direct path to your ears, the better. High in the door or in the A-pillar makes the most sense. |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Back Bacon
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Ontario + Ottawa Posts: 10
| Choice number 1. I don't like splitting up the mid and tweet, they cover a range that either speaker can be reproducing the same instrument (yes I know this could apply to the midbass as well, but you can't usually fit all three in the same space, so I consider this the lesser of two evils). Mids and tweets on the dash at the far corners and midbass in the kicks is how mine is set up now, If I can find the space (and time to build it) I'll move the midbass up there too.
I am also not opposed to a nice small set of tweeters with minimal power crossed over in the 16k+ range at eye level in the a pillars. But that would be icing on the cake in an otherwise complete front stage, I would rather put those resources into a better set of main speakers first. |
| | |   |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |  | » Recent Threads | | | | | | | | | | | |