Welcome to Canadian Car Audio - Canada’s #1 Car Audio Forum   Members
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-18-2004, 05:51 PM   #1 (permalink)
Post
CCA McKenzie
 
fozzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
iTrader: (1)
Posts: 877
Hi everyone. I'm getting my car ready for the upcomming season but I am still having trouble with my head unit choices. I had planned on using a Pioneer P9 system to do all the source and processing duties. To be honest the only real reason I wanted the P9 was for the delay. I will be a rookie this year so judges will only be in one seat. Can you get a solid center stage and good height with out a delay (I'm not willing to cut my car up too much)??? I drive a 2000 NEON and for the most part the pathlengths are pretty good. My other choice for source duties would be the NAK. 700II with the audiocontrol digital x-over/eq.

Please help [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
__________________
TEAM HYBRID AUDIO



"I have a 1500 watt hair dryer, but it sounds like sh!t"
fozzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2004, 05:58 PM   #2 (permalink)
Post
MB
CCA Hoser
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
iTrader: (0)
Posts: 429
IMO, p9 combo is far superior than the cd700/AC combo

time delay is u'r friend
__________________
Mark Bruno<br />KanKar Marketing<br />Exclusive Canadian Distribution<br /><a href="http://www.KanKar.com" target="_blank">www.KanKar.com</a><br />mbruno@kankar.com
MB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2004, 06:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
Post
CCA Hoser
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
iTrader: (0)
Posts: 456
ohh, i say delay! nice difference when set properly
__________________
--------------------<br /><a href="http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/594762/" target="_blank"> my Nissan </a><br />--------------------
Nissan Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2004, 07:04 PM   #4 (permalink)
Post
--SPECIAL ED--
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
iTrader: (0)
Posts: 0
One thing to think of is guys have been setting up cars for years before this fance delay/time correction came around. IMO time correction is only good for two things. 1) Someone who hasn't a clue on how to set up a car properly or 2) a final "tweek" once the car is set up.

Don't get me wrong, time correction is a great feature, but I think too many people are relying on it to achieve great results and putting less time into the actuall install. My advice is to learn what it takes to get a car sounding great first, then worry about time correction for fine tuning.

Being its your first year and your only being judged from one seat, it should be quite easy to achieve your image and stage.
Peter Barry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2004, 08:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
Post
CCA Golden Toque
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kitchener, Ont
iTrader: (0)
Posts: 1,231
oh.. its that easy [img]graemlins/freak.gif[/img]
Seahag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2004, 08:20 PM   #6 (permalink)
Post
CCA Golden Toque
 
SUX 2BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
iTrader: (1)
Posts: 2,190
IMO do not rely on electronic processors and aides to make up for lack of install and system design. Get the P9 but not for the sole reason as to rely on the time alignment to give better sound. It's not an end-all, be-all solution. Cars can, and have, even done very well in competition without such processing. Sounds uncomprehensible when t-a processing is the flavor of the day but it's true.
__________________
My Sounddomain Page: http://www.cardomain.com/id/sux2bu99
97 Avenger ES, 90 Daytona, 02 Neon R/T, 85 Chevy Silverado, 88 Mustang GT, various projects and gear, 05 Magnum R/T, 66 Cadillac hearse
SUX 2BU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2004, 08:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
Post
CCA McKenzie
 
fozzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
iTrader: (1)
Posts: 877
Thanks guys. To be honest I'm really not worried about my install (I will do my best). I am competing as a rookie but I have been playing with car audio for nearly 15 years. So my install should be sufficient. But I want to start as a rookie to sort of test the waters in IASCA. And of course I would like both seats to image well.
__________________
TEAM HYBRID AUDIO



"I have a 1500 watt hair dryer, but it sounds like sh!t"
fozzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2004, 08:49 PM   #8 (permalink)
Post
--SPECIAL ED--
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
iTrader: (0)
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by Seahag:
oh.. its that easy [img]graemlins/freak.gif[/img]
IMO yes it is that easy. Your talking one seat. If you know how to make a decent pair of kicks, one seat should be a snap.
Peter Barry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2004, 11:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
Post
--SPECIAL ED--
 
defro13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
iTrader: (0)
Posts: 3,260
kick panels dont make image and stage a snap, there is narrow stage issues with most kick panel installs, rainbow if you will, getting center image might be easier with kich panel mounted speakers, but getting a wide stage is a totally different story with kick panel mounted midrange/bass and tweeters, i have heard very few vehicles with what i would consider a wide stage, and truth be told even with kick mounted speakers there is still time alignment issues. it is widely accepted that humans can hear time variances as little as 1.5 ms which is about 5-6 cm, and most vehicle even with k/p mounted speakers have variances in excess of that. there are many people myself included that spent many many hours on our installs, and design, and in the end t/a was critical for stage width and especially depth, i agree it makes for a one seat sq install but i guess i disagree with your generalization that most people use as a bandaid for poor preparation and not as an installation aid that in most cases can yeild huge benefits in a single seat sq vehicle
defro13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2004, 07:59 AM   #10 (permalink)
Post
CCA Hoser
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
iTrader: (0)
Posts: 206
When I tune, or build any comp car the last thing I touch is processing.

I will do most of the work with speaker polarity, and crossover points/slopes/levels.

Using any type of processing is a last resort in any audio system regardless of type.

However real world and what you can do are two very different things
__________________
Jamie Edmundson<br />1996 Impala SS<br />Team DLS Canada<br />IASCA Expert 601+<br /><br />And I just got a 2005 300C...yep with the Hemi....audio coming soon<br /><br />Coming to an IASCA event near you.....very soon
Impala Builder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Advertisers










advertise here

» Recent Threads
Mobile Dynamics Closes Its Doors
Last post by [i]con
Today 08:20 PM
The car Fozz built!!!
Last post by Killer_klown187
Today 08:07 PM
Budget setup help required
Last post by Northside Taco
Today 08:02 PM
Urban Disturbance in Kitchener !
Last post by Father Yuli
Today 07:22 PM
Free Credit Reports | Web Advertising | Wikipedia | Mortgage Calculator | Mortgage Calculator

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Canadian Car Audio
Page generated in 0.34219 seconds with 12 queries