 | |  | |  | | Supporting Member
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Kitchener, Ontario. Posts: 797
| you cant get a 2 Ohm load (optimal for this amp) out of two DVC 4 Ohm subs, so you'll be severely underpowering those subs.
Do you already have the equipment?...or just considering buying this stuff?
__________________ |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Back Bacon
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Alberta, Fort McMurray Posts: 8
| i already have the equipment.
i had it installed professionally in a previous vehicle ~2 years ago. i took it out when i sold it, now want to put it in the new vehicle. the guys that installed it aren't in business any more... i think i know why.... |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Back Bacon
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Alberta, Fort McMurray Posts: 8
| i'm not sure what is worth more money, the amp or the two subs (neither are brand-name). but what would be requirements of a new amp? 1 ohm stable, with at least 1000W peak? |
| | |   |  | |  | | Supporting Member
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Kitchener, Ontario. Posts: 797
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by jono_s i'm not sure what is worth more money, the amp or the two subs (neither are brand-name). but what would be requirements of a new amp? 1 ohm stable, with at least 1000W peak? | yup, or 4 Ohm.
__________________ |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Hoser
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BC Posts: 88
| this is what you want. http://akamaipix.crutchfield.com/ca/..._4-ohm_2ch.jpg
I'm not sure what MTT is talking about. You can get a 2ohm load. Running the 4ohm DVC in parallel will give you 2ohm for each sub.
Since your amp supports 2ohms, and has 2 channels. Each sub will get 240w (I hope thats RMS). Like MTT said, "you'll be severely underpowering those subs" as each sub is 500W RMS.
NEVER use Peak power for ANYTHING. RMS only. |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Hoser
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BC Posts: 88
| I suggest getting a new amp for those subs (1000w RMS). But if its a no name sub, the RMS rating is probably overrated. |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Back Bacon
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Alberta, Fort McMurray Posts: 8
| Njord, it was running with this setup before in my old vehicle, and seemed fine (although i have no basis for comparison). i'm pretty sure it was "bridged" before when the "pro's" installed it (the mono diagram link)
if i hook the subs up again (but with 2-channel wiring instead, as in the diagram) since the subs are still being underpowered i guess i can assume i'm in danger of wrecking the subs? |
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Hoser
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BC Posts: 88
| If it was bridged then you were getting 340w RMS (170w RMS per sub) Which is retarded. If you were to redo this, and not buy any new equipment. I suggest wiring it up like I said above. then you'll get 240W RMS to each sub.
Still, buying a new amp would be better (maybe new subs too)
"since the subs are still being underpowered i guess i can assume i'm in danger of wrecking the subs?"
Well, yes, but no. Yes if you really push the subs, the amp will just start to distort. Thus potentially wrecking them.
But if you keep it below the distorting point, you'll be fine.
Grammar....
Last edited by Njord : 07-24-2008 at 04:45 PM.
|
| | |   |  | |  | | CCA Back Bacon
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Alberta, Fort McMurray Posts: 8
| ok, i'll see how it goes wiring as per your suggestion, and look into getting a better amp. thanks for the help. |
| | |   |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |  | » Recent Threads | | | | | | | | | | | |